|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
The first reported cases of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infections in Cameroon occurred in non-immune expatriates under chemoprophylaxis who visited or were residing in Limbé or Douala, coastal cities in the western part of the country, in 19851986.13 Subsequent studies on the response of Cameroonian patients and asymptomatic school children to chloroquine therapy had confirmed the emergence and spread of chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum in other parts of the country during the late 1980s and early 1990s.47 Despite the fact that these clinical studies had been useful to detect and follow the evolution of chloroquine-resistant malaria, the results are not directly comparable since the studies had been conducted according to a nonstandardized protocol or the now outdated 7-day test developed by the World Health Organization (WHO).8 Nonetheless, the clinical observations are supported by in vitro surveys conducted during the same period.913
Since 1994, the WHO has been developing and updating a standardized protocol for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of first-line and second-line antimalarial drugs.1416 Unlike the former standard 7-day and 28-day tests,8 which required a daily parasitological examination for the first 7 days (followed by a weekly parasitological examination for the 28-day test) in asymptomatic carriers or patients followed in a malaria-free zone, the new standardized test defines a set of inclusion criteria and requires a minimum number of clinical and parasitological follow-up examinations for at least 14 days. Furthermore, the interpretation of results takes into account both clinical and parasitological responses. Although there is no in vivo test for drug resistance that is devoid of pitfalls, the majority of malaria experts consider the current WHO protocol for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy during the 28-day follow-up to be practical and useful to guide the national antimalarial drug policy, in particular in areas where transmission is intense and reinfection is common. The important merit of the WHO protocol is that the results from different investigators working in various epidemiologic contexts are comparable.
Cameroon is one of the first countries that has adopted the new WHO protocol for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of antimalarial drugs.1720 As part of the national surveillance program of drug-resistant malaria, we applied the WHO protocol to evaluate the efficacy of chloroquine (first-line drug in Cameroon until 2002), amodiaquine (alternative first-line drug until 2004), and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (second-line drug until 2004) administered as monotherapy in symptomatic children from 19992004. The results of our monitoring allowed the selection of amodiaquine as the most suitable partner of artesunate on a rational basis. Furthermore, blood samples collected as part of the clinical studies constitute our primary source of field isolates of P. falciparum for the molecular analysis of resistance genes.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
7 months (NovemberJune) and a short rainy season (JulyOctober) with low precipitation (400900 mm). The Sudanese-type tropical climate in the north (Garoua and Ngaoundéré) is also characterized by 2 seasons, a relatively shorter dry season lasting about 36 months and longer rainy season (MarchNovember in Ngaoundéré) with heavier precipitation (9001,500 mm), as compared with the far north. The Guinea-type equatorial climate in the southern, central, and eastern regions is characterized by fairly constant temperatures, abundant rainfall (1,5002,000 mm), and 4 distinct seasons: 2 rainy seasons (MarchMay, SeptemberNovember) and 2 dry seasons (DecemberFebruary, JuneAugust). The Cameroonian-type equatorial climate in southwestern coastal region and western highlands is characterized by fairly constant temperatures and 2 seasons: a short dry season (NovemberMarch) and a long rainy season with abundant precipitation (2,00010,000 mm). In general, malaria transmission is intense and continuous throughout the year in coastal, southern, central, western, and eastern regions, with peak seasons corresponding to the rainy seasons. By contrast, malaria transmission is seasonal in the north.
|
|
Patients.
Children were enrolled after free and informed consent of the parents and/or legal guardians if the following inclusion criteria were met: age less than or equal to 10 years old (generally less than 5 years old in areas of intense transmission; up to 10 years old in western highlands and in the sahel), fever (either history of fever within the past 24 hours or fever at the time of consultation [i.e. rectal temperature
38.0°C]), parasite density
2,000 asexual P. falciparum parasites/µL of blood (without other Plasmodium species), and hematocrit
15%.1416 Children with signs and symptoms associated with concomitant infectious diseases, severe malnutrition, or danger signs defined by the WHO (e.g., inability to feed, sit, or stand up, repeated vomiting, convulsion, altered state of consciousness) were excluded.
The WHO protocol has undergone several modifications between 1994 and 2003, partly due to the difficulties in setting the same inclusion criteria for different epidemiologic situations.21 These changes, together with the heterogeneity of transmission patterns in Cameroon, explain why slightly different inclusion criteria were used in some of our studies. The priority age group in areas of intense transmission in Africa is less than 5 years of age, but all age groups may be included in areas of low transmission. In our study, the upper age limit was arbitrarily set at 10 years of age. Earlier WHO protocols allowed the inclusion of patients with either a history of fever within the past 48 hours or axillary temperature range between 37.5°C and 39.5°C at the time of consultation, whereas the 2003 protocol requires fever at the time of consultation, without any upper limit of body temperature. In our studies, some smear-positive children who were afebrile at the time of consultation and to whom antipyretics were given before consultation were included. The 1994 protocol sets the lower and upper limits of parasitemia to 500 and 250,000 asexual parasites/µL of blood, respectively. The 1996 protocol sets the limits between 2,000 and 100,000 asexual parasites/µL of blood. According to the 2003 protocol, the lower and upper limits are 1,0002,000 and 100,000200,000 asexual parasites/µL of blood, respectively, depending on the intensity of malaria transmission. In our studies, patients with
2,000 asexual parasites/µL of blood were included, without any upper limit as long as there were no danger signs. The measurement of hematocrit (or hemoglobin) was required by the 1994 and 1996 protocols to limit patient inclusion to those with hematocrit > 15%. Hematocrit measurement is optional in the 2003 protocol. In our studies, hematocrit was measured in every included patient. Few patients with a low hematocrit (
12%) were included. The studies were approved by the Cameroonian National Ethics Committee and the Cameroonian Ministry of Public Health.
Treatment and follow-up. Most of our studies were non-randomized. Chloroquine was administered at a total dose of 25 mg/kg body weight (10 mg base/kg body weight on days 0 and 1, and 5 mg base/kg body weight on day 2). Amodiaquine was administered at a total dose of 30 mg base/kg body weight (10 mg base/kg body weight on days 0, 1, and 2) as either oral suspension (Flavoquine®; Hoechst Marion Roussel) or tablets. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (25 mg/kg body weight sulfadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg body weight pyrimethamine) was administered in a single dose. Paracetamol (30 mg/kg body weight/day) was administered to all patients.
The patients were followed on days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14 at either health centers or home. Parents whose children developed fever or required other medical attention between days 4 and 6 and between days 8 and 13 were strongly advised to return to the health care center. Clinical and parasitological examinations were performed during each follow-up visit. Likewise, each dose was administered under supervision during the visits. Patients were observed for at least 30 minutes. If vomiting occurred within 30 minutes, another dose was administered. Patients with repeated vomiting were excluded from the study and treated with parenteral quinine followed by oral quinine. Patients who failed to respond to the assigned drug were treated with oral quinine (25 mg/kg body weight/day for 5 days).
Data interpretation.
The lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) method was used to calculate the sample size for studies between 1999 and 2001, which included the assessment of chloroquine.15 The sample size was calculated to be 63, with the confidence level (1-
) and power (1-ß) set at 95% and 80%, respectively. The lower and upper limits for treatment failure rates were fixed at 12.5% (i.e., acceptable therapeutic efficacy if failure rate is
12.5%) and 25% (i.e., unacceptable therapeutic efficacy if the failure rate is
25%), respectively. A major advantage of the LQAS method is that it allowed an early termination of the study if a high proportion of patients failed to respond to chloroquine. This ethical consideration was important for studies conducted in southern and central Cameroon, where previous studies have suggested that chloroquine is ineffective. In the studies on amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine between 2002 and 2004, the minimum sample size was set at 50, with the anticipated prevalence of therapeutic failure of 15%, confidence level of 95%, and precision of the estimated prevalence of 10%.16 The expected prevalence of clinical failure was based on an earlier study.20
The clinical and parasitological response of each patient was classified according to the 2003 WHO protocol:16 (i) early treatment failure (ETF), danger signs or severe and complicated malaria on days 13 with positive smear, parasitemia on day 2 > parasitemia on day 0, parasitemia on day 3
25% of parasitemia on day 0, or positive smear and fever on day 3; (ii) late clinical failure (LCF), danger signs, or severe and complicated malaria on days 414 with positive smear, or positive smear and fever on days 414; (iii) late parasitological failure (LPF), positive smear on day 14 without fever; and (iv) adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR), negative smear on day 14, with or without fever.
Results were expressed as the percentage of patients response corresponding to one of the 4 possible responses. It is generally considered that failure rates (ETF + LCF + LPF) should be < 15% for a drug to be a viable option. Drugs with failure rates > 25% may be said to be ineffective. Such high failure rates are a strong indication for a change in drug policy. However, it must be emphasized that a single study performed at a sentinel site may not warrant a change in drug policy. A sufficient amount of clinical and parasitological data collected over several sites and over a period of time is required before a rational decision can be made. Part of the results on amodiaquine (N = 62 enrolled patients) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (N = 64) in Hévécam in 2001 was published in our previous work.22 These data were included in the present study to describe the global situation of the epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria in Cameroon.
Proportions were compared between groups by the
2 test. The mean hematocrit values on day 0 and day 14 were compared by the paired t test. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Data were analyzed by the Epi-Info software.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
Amodiaquine administered as monotherapy has been an effective alternative first-line drug in Cameroon since the late 1980s.6,7,13,25,27,28 More recent clinical studies, including those described in the present series of studies, confirm that the drug remains highly effective in Cameroon, even in chloroquine-resistant areas.20,29 At least part of the reason may be related to the fact that amodiaquine has not been extensively distributed throughout the country in the 1990s and chloroquine-resistant malaria has often been treated with quinine. Serious concerns have been raised on the potential hepatic and hematological toxic effects of amodiaquine after repeated and regular intake, as in the past practice of weekly prophylaxis for non-immune travelers.30 However, when the usual dose of amodiaquine is administered for treatment, the risk for toxic reactions is limited, and side effects are mild and transient. The drug is an effective therapeutic option in many African countries.31 When patients were followed until day 28 after amodiaquine monotherapy in Hévécam, Cameroon, the failure rate increased to 10.2%, as compared with 3.3% on day 14.22 In our previous studies based on the analysis of 3 polymorphic genetic markers, persistence or reappearance of parasitemia on or before day 14 after treatment with chloroquine, amodiaquine, or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was mostly due to recrudescence, whereas reinfection was common beyond day 14 in our study sites.32,33
Earlier studies had shown the 100% efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in a small number of patients who failed to respond to chloroquine after either a full prescribed course or self-medication at the time when the use of antifolate drugs was still limited in Cameroon.4,5,34 However, a later study based on the 1996 WHO protocol has shown the failure rate of 12% in adults and children aged more than 5 years who had no recent intake of antimalarial drugs.20 In the present study, in which many children with a recent history of self-medication with antimalarial drugs were enrolled, the overall failure rate was 8%. Paradoxically, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, the second-line drug, was less effective than amodiaquine, an alternative first-line drug. However, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is still a viable option in Cameroon, especially if it is combined with a suitable drug partner to prolong its period of clinical utility and/or if its use is limited to a specific target population, such as for the intermittent preventive treatment in pregnant women.
Based on the results obtained from various sentinel sites in different epidemiologic situations in Cameroon, amodiaquine was officially selected as the most suitable component of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in 2004. Although chloroquine is still moderately effective in the far north during the 14-day follow-up period, its continued use restricted to this region is not possible since a single drug or drug combination is required for the implementation of a single national drug policy over the entire country. Furthermore, its failure rate is expected to be unacceptable beyond day 14. Artesunate-amodiaquine combination has been shown to be well tolerated and effective in African countries, including Cameroon (Basco, unpublished data).35 These drugs mutually protect each other to delay the spread of drug-resistant malaria. The combination will be prescribed for the treatment of all cases of uncomplicated malaria in Cameroon, and the therapeutic scheme of first-line, second-line, and third-line drugs will no longer be applied. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine still has an important role to play in antimalarial chemotherapy in Africa, in particular for the intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy. Artesunate-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is also an alternative ACT that has been shown to be effective in Africa (Basco, unpublished data).36 Regular surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy using a standard protocol is an important component of malaria control that provides evidence-based data to implement, adjust, and modify the national drug policy to combat drug-resistant malaria.
Received October 24, 2005. Accepted for publication May 3, 2006.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the personnel of dispensaries and hospitals for their aid in recruiting patients.
Financial support: This study was supported by the Regional Office for Africa, World Health Organization (Harare, Zimbabwe); Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie; Department of Cooperation, French Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Fonds dAide et de Coopération, Programme Mobilisateur Paludisme); and French Ministry of Research (Programme VIHPAL/PAL+).
* Address correspondence to Leonardo Basco, OCEAC, B. P. 288, Yaoundé, Cameroon (Central Africa). E-mail: lkbasco{at}yahoo.fr ![]()
Authors addresses: Leonardo K. Basco, Mathieu Ndounga, Unité de Recherche "Paludologie Afro-tropicale," Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) and Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Paludisme, OCEAC, B. P. 288, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Vincent Foumane Ngane, Georges Soula, Laboratoire de Santé Publique, OCEAC, B. P. 288, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Albert Same-Ekobo, Laboratoire de Parasitologie, Faculté de Médecine, B. P. 3266, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Jean-Christian Youmba, Raphael Therese Okalla Abodo, Groupe Technique Central, Comité National Roll Back Malaria, Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme, Ministère de la Santé Publique, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Tahar and L. K. Basco Molecular Epidemiology of Malaria in Cameroon. XXVI. Twelve-Year In Vitro and Molecular Surveillance of Pyrimethamine Resistance and Experimental Studies to Modulate Pyrimethamine Resistance Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. BASCO and P. RINGWALD MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF MALARIA IN CAMEROON. XXIV. TRENDS OF IN VITRO ANTIMALARIAL DRUG RESPONSES IN YAOUNDE, CAMEROON Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2007; 76(1): 20 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. TAHAR and L. K. BASCO Molecular epidemiology of malaria in cameroon. Xxii. Geographic mapping and distribution of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) mutant alleles. Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 396 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |