|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
More recently, serologic surveys of humans, rodents, and domestic animals have documented the continued presence of rickettsial agents in Egypt, including Bartonella, Coxiella, Ehrlichia, and spotted fever and typhus group Rickettsia. Serosurveys have revealed that 1030% of adult blood donors, healthy school children, and febrile illness patients have been exposed to C. burnetii, suggesting that the prevalence of antibodies against this agent has changed little since the 1950s.79 Serologic reactivity against spotted fever group Rickettsia (SFGR) has been assessed using Rickettsia conorii antigen, and antibodies have been detected in both humans and rodents, including Acomys sp., Gerbillus sp., and Rattus rattus.8,10 Botros and others10 reported human seroreactivity to typhus group Rickettsia (TGR) in 19% of 178 garbage collectors and rodent control workers from five governorates in northern Egypt and in 33% of 109 patients with febrile illness. In a community-based study in the Nile River Delta, TGR seroprevalence approaching 50% in both adults and children was reported.8,11 In a larger survey, antibodies reactive with R. typhi were detected in 48% of 976 Egyptian patients with acute febrile illness between 1998 and 2000, with the highest seroprevalence rates in the Nile River Delta and Cairo (M.G. Reynolds, personal communication). Rodents are reservoirs of murine typhus, and serologic reactivity of rodents to TGR has been reported throughout Egypt in Acomys sp., Arvicanthis niloticus, Gerbillus sp., Hemiechinus auritus, Meriones sp., Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and R. rattus.1215 In Egypt, antibodies against TGR have also been detected in buffalo, camels, dogs, donkeys, foxes, goats, and sheep.13,1517 Serosurveys of Bartonella and Ehrlichia in the human population of Egypt have not been published, but antibodies reactive with Bartonella henselae and B. quintana were detected in sera from domestic cats,18 and antibodies reactive with Ehrlichia canis were detected in 33% of a study population of domestic dogs.7
Although the persistence of vector-borne bacterial agents in Egypt has been documented by human disease reports and by serologic evidence, little data are available on the presence of these agents in the ectoparasitic fleas that might transmit the diseases from animals to humans. Collections of fleas from peridomestic mammals in governorates throughout Egypt have included Ctenocephalides felis, Echidnophaga gallinacea, Leptopsylla segnis, Nosopsyllus fasciatus, Pulex irritans, Xenopsylla cheopis, and Xenopsylla ramesis.16,1926 Of these, X. cheopis, the primary vector of plague and murine typhus, was the most common flea in all collections. Leptopsylla segnis, an experimental vector of murine typhus,27 and E. gallinacea, which can be naturally infected with murine typhus,28 were also commonly reported fleas. We report the collection, identification, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based bacterial pathogen testing of fleas from peridomestic, urban mammals from 17 cities in Egypt.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
DNA extraction and pooling strategy. Extraction of DNA from individual fleas was performed as described by Moriarity and others,33 using a Wizard SV96 Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega, Madison, WI), and samples were eluted into sterile, nuclease-free polypropylene 96-well plates. The yield of eluted DNA using this procedure is 5060 µL/arthropod (average, 55 µL).33 After extraction, 10 µL aliquots of eluted DNA from each flea were combined, in separate plates, to yield pools representing three fleas each. All DNA samples were stored at 4°C.
Real-time PCR assays. Pooled and individual DNA samples were tested, singly or in duplicate, respectively, using real-time PCR. A Biomek 2000 Laboratory Automation Workstation (Beckman, Fullerton, CA) prepared reactions in 384-well plates, with 1.0 µL of template DNA in a 10-µL final reaction volume, and PCR amplification and data analysis were performed using a 7900HT thermocycler and associated software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The Brilliant qPCR Core Reagent Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used for TaqMan assays, which use a fluorescent oligonucleotide probe. The SYBR Green PCR Core Reagent kit (Applied Biosystems) was used for assays based on SYBR Green dye as the detector and melt curve analysis (4595°C) was performed after amplification.
Primer sequences and concentrations for each assay are summarized in Table 1
. DNA from Anaplasma and Ehrlichia spp. was detected with a previously described SYBR assay, with a sensitivity of 10 gene copies, that targets the 16S rRNA gene.34 Bartonella spp. were detected using a newly designed SYBR assay that targets the citrate synthase gene (Table 1
); the assay has a sensitivity of 10 gene copies using B. henselae DNA and detects diverse Bartonella spp., including B. bacilliformis, B. elizabethae, B. henselae, B. koehlerae, B. shoenbuchensis, and B. quintana. The multicopy IS1111 transposable element of Coxiella burnetii was detected using a Taq-Man assay with a lower limit of detection of one C. burnetii organism (Table 1
). The 17-kd antigen gene of Rickettsia spp. was detected using previously described primers R17D135F and R17D249R,35 with a newly designed probe (Table 1
). The new probe, R17K-C, improved the sensitivity of the assay to 10 gene copies, and quantitation was accomplished using a 10-fold dilution curve of a plasmid containing the 17-kd antigen gene from R. prowazekii. These four assays use the same thermocycler conditions: 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds. The multicopy pla gene of Yersinia pestis was detected using a previously described SYBR Green assay and thermocycler conditions.36
|
Sequencing and GenBank accession numbers. PCR amplicons selected for DNA sequence analysis were prepared using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Sequencing reactions were performed in duplicate, using the forward and reverse PCR primers and the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Excess dye was removed using DyeEx 2.0 columns (Qiagen). Sequences were resolved with the ABI 3100 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence fragments were aligned with SeqMerge (Accelrys, San Diego, CA), and primer sequences were removed. The resulting sequences were compared with published sequences in GenBank using Blast 2.0.45 Representative sequences were submitted to GenBank, as follows: Bartonella spp. groEL gene PCR amplicons from X. cheopis, "A" DQ166941 and "B" DQ166942; Bartonella sp. "C" ITS amplicon from X. cheopis and L. segnis, DQ166943; Bartonella sp. "D" ITS amplicon from X. cheopis, DQ166944; Bartonella sp. "E" groEL gene PCR amplicon from L. segnis, DQ166945; Coxiella sp. superoxide dismutase gene PCR amplicon from X. cheopis, DQ166935; Rickettsia typhi 17-kd gene amplicon, DQ166936; Rickettsia sp. 17-kd gene amplicon from E. gallinacea, DQ166937; Rickettsia sp. citrate synthase gene amplicon from E. gallinacea, DQ166938; and Rickettsia spp. 17-kd antigenic gene sequences from X. cheopis, DQ166939 and DQ166940.
Phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic analysis was used to compare the DNA sequences from groEL gene amplicons from Egypt with published sequences from B. alsatica (AF299357), B. birtlesii (AF355773), B. bacilliformis (M98257), B. clarridgeiae (AF014831), B. doshiae (AF014832), B. elizabethae (AF014834), B. grahamii (AF014833), B. henselae (AF304020), "Bartonella phoceensis" (AY515129), "Bartonella rattimassiliensis" (AY515128), B. quintana (AF014830), B. taylorii (AF304017), and B. vinsonii berkhoffii (AF014836). Sequences were aligned using ClustalW.46 Unrooted parsimony analysis (1,002 bp) of the aligned sequences was performed using the Phylip 3.62 software package,47 and 100 bootstrap replicates were performed.
Statistics.
2 analysis was used to compare the proportion of male and female fleas infected with of R. typhi, the proportion of R. typhiinfected fleas collected from black rats versus Norway rats, and the proportion of R. typhiinfected fleas at each individual site.
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
|
Bartonella.
Using a real-time PCR assay, DNA from Bartonella spp. was detected in 21 fleas, including 1 L. segnis and 20 X. cheopis, from Alexandria, Mansoura, and Mokattam Village (Cairo). Eleven of these fleas were positive using a conventional PCR assay for the 16S23S ITS region of Bartonella, and 17 were positive using a PCR assay for the Bartonella groEL gene. Two distinct groEL sequences and two distinct ITS sequences were obtained from these fleas (Table 3
). A short fragment of the groEL amplicon from L. segnis was sequenced using the reverse PCR primer and seems to represent a third groEL genotype ("E"), but all attempts to sequence the amplicon using the forward primer yielded mixed sequences, suggesting coinfection of this flea with an unidentified Bartonella sp. According to a BLAST analysis performed using these sequences, all five sequences represent previously unreported Bartonella spp. The groEL "A" sequence was 89% similar to B. alsatica and "B. phoceensis"; groEL "B" was 92% similar to B. clarridgeiae; groEL "E" was 95% similar to B. tribocorum and 92% similar to B. elizabethae; ITS "C" was 9093% similar to unnamed Bartonella spp. from C. felis (strain CtF4YN, AY566176) and Rattus tanezumi flavipectus from China (strain Rt222sm, AY277896); and ITS "D" was 8590% similar to B. tribocorum, B. grahamii, and B. elizabethae. Unrooted parsimony analysis of 1,002 bp of the groEL gene sequence showed strong support that genotype "B" is related to B. clarridgeiae (100/100 bootstrap replicates), and genotype "A" formed a clade with B. alsatica and "B. phoceensis" (Figure 1
).
|
|
Rickettsia. DNA of Rickettsia was detected using a real-time PCR assay that amplifies and quantifies the 17-kd antigen gene of all known SFGR and TGR spp. Using this assay, 41 individual fleas were positive for Rickettsia spp.: 12/12 (100%) E. gallinacea, from five black rats trapped in Mansoura and Zagazig, 1/36 (2.8%) L. segnis, collected from a black rat from Mansoura, and 28/900 (3.1%) X. cheopis. Amplification of a larger fragment of the same gene, using conventional PCR primers,40 was successful for all 12 E. gallinacea, the 1 L. segnis, and 16 of the 28 X. cheopis that were positive using the real-time PCR assay. An additional 11 X. cheopis produced amplicons using nested PCR. The one X. cheopis DNA extract that was negative using the nested PCR assay contained only 26.4 ± 0.3 copies of this gene per microliter. RFLP analysis of the conventional, non-nested PCR amplicons with AluI produced two patterns: amplicons from X. cheopis and L. segnis produced a doublet at ~220 and 200 bp, and amplicons from E. gallinacea produced distinct bands at ~190 and 120 bp (data not shown).
Sequence analysis was performed on all conventional PCR amplicons from L. segnis, X. cheopis, and E. gallinacea. The sequences of the 17-kd amplicons from 25 X. cheopis and the L. segnis were 100% similar to each other and to published sequences for R. typhi, with predicted AluI RFLP fragments at 228 and 196 bp. Two of the X. cheopis contained DNA from SFGR (26118 copies of the 17-kd gene/µL DNA, ~1,3007,080 genomes per flea): the sequence of the amplicon from one X. cheopis from a black rat in Suez was 100% (116/116 bp) similar to "R. amblyommii", R. cooperi, R. honei, R. parkeri, and R. rickettsii; and the amplicon from a X. cheopis from a Norway rat in Alexandria was 97% similar (113/116 bp) to R. conorii and R. montanensis. The small size of the nested PCR fragments precluded definitive identification of these agents to the species level.
The 25 X. cheopis containing DNA from R. typhi are listed in Table 4
and were collected from Norway rats (13 fleas) and black rats (12 fleas) from 9 of the 17 sampled cities: Alexandria, Mokattam Village (Cairo), Ismailia, Mansoura, Port Said, Quseir, Safaga, Suez, and Wadi El Natroun. The number of 17-kd gene copies in these fleas varied from < 100 to > 5 x 105/µL of DNA extract. Both male (11 fleas) and female (14 fleas) fleas contained DNA from R. typhi. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of R. typhi infection between male and female fleas (P = 0.598) or between fleas collected from black rats and Norway rats (P = 0.986). The proportion of fleas containing R. typhi was significantly higher in fleas collected from Suez (12.5%, 6/48, P = 0.0002); however, five of these six fleas containing R. typhi DNA came from the same host animal.
|
Yersinia pestis. The pla gene of Y. pestis was not detected in any of the 987 DNA extracts derived from Egyptian fleas. Equivocal real-time PCR results were obtained for seven pools of DNA, in which small peaks were seen after 4045 cycles of amplification, possibly representing trace quantities of the target gene or non-specific amplification of DNA. All 21 individual fleas from these pools were negative when evaluated using a conventional, nested PCR assay.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
Previously undescribed Bartonella spp. were detected in several X. cheopis and one L. segnis collected in Egypt. The conventional PCR amplicons obtained from these fleas produced three sequences for the groEL gene and two for the 16S23S ITS region. All of these sequences represent undescribed Bartonella genotypes. Phylogenetic analysis of the groEL gene sequences suggests that one of these new Bartonella sp. is related to B. clarridgeiae and might, therefore, be pathogenic to humans. Further studies are needed to assess the pathogenicity of the novel Bartonella spp., their antigenic similarity to pathogens of humans or domestic animals, and the exposure of humans in Egypt to flea-borne Bartonella infections.
Coxiella burnetii was detected in 2 of the 987 fleas, and definitive identification was possible in a X. cheopis from Alexandria. This low infection rate is not unexpected, because C. burnetii is transmitted primarily by aerosol, milk products, or ticks.52 Similarly, we did not detect Anaplasma and Ehrlichia spp. in fleas from Egypt; these agents are transmitted by ticks but have not been described from fleas.5355
Rickettsia typhi, the agent of murine typhus, was detected in 25 (2.8%) of the X. cheopis and in one (2.7%) L. segnis, and SFGR were detected in 2 (0.2%) of the X. cheopis. Typhus-positive fleas were collected from both Norway and black rats from nine cities in the Nile Delta, Suez Canal area, and the coast of the Red Sea. We did not detect DNA from R. typhi from fleas from eight other cities in Egypt, but this finding was not statistically significant because of the small number of X. cheopis collected from these areas. These data are, however, consistent with serosurveys from Egypt that have recorded a higher prevalence of antibodies against TGR versus SFGR and that have documented the presence of antibodies versus TGR in the Nile River Delta.8,10,15,56 The number of rickettsial 17-kd antigen gene copies in the fleas containing R. typhi DNA ranged from 101.1 to 105.7 per microliter of DNA, and the average volume of DNA from each flea was 5060 µL; therefore, the number of gene copies per flea was ~103108. Similar titers of R. typhi have been reported 732 days after experimental infection of X. cheopis,57 and these data suggest that the X. cheopis collected in Egypt were infected with the pathogen at the time of collection. The number of R. typhi gene copies detected in L. segnis was near the low end of this range (103.3103.6) and could represent either infection of the flea or residual DNA from a blood meal. These data document the presence of R. typhi in an enzootic Rattus/X. cheopis cycle in Egypt, and this enzootic cycle provides a reservoir for continued human exposure to TGR.
The SFGR in X. cheopis could not be identified conclusively to the species level, because of the low number of copies and the short fragment obtained by nested PCR. The sequences of the short amplicons produced by the nested PCR assay suggest that one of the fleas contained DNA from R. conorii (or a similar agent) and the other contained DNA from an unnamed SFGR. Detection of DNA from SFGR in X. cheopis could reflect residual DNA acquired during a blood meal or infection of the fleas.
Only 12 E. gallinacea were collected, from five black rats in the Nile Delta, but all 12 fleas contained DNA from an unnamed Rickettsia sp. This high infection rate (100%) and large number of gene copies detected in these fleas might be because of efficient vertical transmission of the unknown agent, as has been described for Rickettsia felis in C. felis58 or because of horizontal transmission. Echidnophaga gallinacea has been collected from rodents, dogs, and foxes in Egypt59,60 and has been reported to bite humans.61 It is possible, therefore, that humans or domestic animals could be exposed to this agent. Similar, possibly identical, Rickettsia have been described from Ctenocephalides spp. in the United States and Thailand, but the pathogenicity of this agent has not been determined.49,50 Additional studies, using a larger sample of E. gallinacea from Egypt, are needed to confirm the high infection rate in this flea, to determine whether humans or animals are, in fact, exposed to the rickettsial agent, and to establish the pathogenicity of the agent.
It is noteworthy, given the historical reports of plague epidemics in Egypt1,2 and the fact that X. cheopis is considered to be the primary vector of this agent, that Y. pestis was not detected in any of the 900 X. cheopis we sampled. These data are compatible with the reported disappearance of plague from Egypt in the second half of the 20th century2 and with the absence of reported plague cases from Egypt in recent times.
In summary, we identified DNA from Bartonella spp., Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia typhi, and an unnamed SFGR agent in fleas collected from Egypt between July 2002 and July 2003. Two additional SFGR were identified in fleas but definitive species identification was not possible. R. typhi and C. burnetii are known to be pathogenic to humans, and human exposure to these agents has been documented multiple times during the last century. The medical and veterinary significance of the previously undescribed Bartonella spp. and the unnamed SFGR genotype remain to be determined; these agents may be benign symbionts of the fleas, rodent pathogens ingested during a blood meal, or they may be emergent pathogens of public health significance.
Received September 12, 2005. Accepted for publication February 21, 2006.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Maria Badra, Alaa Taher, Emad El Din Yehia, and Ahmed Fawzi for invaluable support provided in Egypt, and Herbert Thompson and Rachel Priestley, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, for permitting us to use a previously unpublished real-time PCR assay for Coxiella burnetii. Special thanks are extended to the team members from the Vector Biology Department at the Egyptian Ministry of Health for their great support in the field work for this study.
Financial support: This work was supported by GEIS, Work Unit 847705.82000.25GB.E0018. The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States Government.
* Address correspondence to Amanda D. Loftis, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS G-13, Atlanta, GA 30333. E-mail: aloftis{at}cdc.gov ![]()
Authors addresses: Amanda D. Loftis, Will K. Reeves, John R. Moriarity, and Gregory A. Dasch, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS G-13, Atlanta, GA 30333, E-mails: aloftis{at}cdc.gov, WReeves1{at}cdc.gov, JMoriarity{at}cdc.gov, and GDasch{at}cdc.gov. Daniel E. Szumlas, Navy Disease Vector Ecology and Control Center, Box 43, NAS, Jacksonville, FL, 32212-0043, E-mail: SzumlasD{at}namru3.med.navy.mil Magda M. Abbassy and Ibrahim M. Helmy, United States Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, PSC 452, Box 5000, FPO AE 09835-0007.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-W. Lin, C.-Y. Chen, W.-C. Chen, B. B. Chomel, and C.-C. Chang Isolation of Bartonella species from rodents in Taiwan including a strain closely related to 'Bartonella rochalimae' from Rattus norvegicus J. Med. Microbiol., December 1, 2008; 57(12): 1496 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Jones, K. F. McCormick, and A. P. Martin Bacterial Communities of Bartonella-Positive Fleas: Diversity and Community Assembly Patterns Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2008; 74(5): 1667 - 1670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Abbot, A. E. Aviles, L. Eller, and L. A. Durden Mixed Infections, Cryptic Diversity, and Vector-Borne Pathogens: Evidence from Polygenis Fleas and Bartonella Species Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2007; 73(19): 6045 - 6052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Li, Q. Y. Liu, D. Z. Yu, J. Z. Zhang, Z. D. Gong, and X. P. Song PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF BARTONELLA DETECTED IN RODENT FLEAS IN YUNNAN, CHINA J. Wildl. Dis., October 1, 2007; 43(4): 609 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Parker, C. K. Murray, A. L. Richards, A. Samir, T. Ismail, M. A. Fadeel, J. Jiang, M. O. Wasfy, and G. Pimentel Concurrent Infections in Acute Febrile Illness Patients in Egypt Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 390 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |