|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
Human malaria is caused by four species of Plasmodium that co-exist in various combinations in endemic regions. Although P. falciparum is responsible for most of the mortality attributed directly to malaria, P. vivax induces enormous morbidity worldwide, despite its virtual absence from sub-Saharan Africa.1,2 Mixed P. vivaxP. falciparum infections in humans can arise through sequential bites by singly infected mosquitoes or a single bite by a dually infected mosquito.3 Also possible is concurrent activation of latent P. vivax liver stages. Most cross-sectional surveys of human populations have shown deficits of P. vivaxP. falciparum infections, relative to the frequencies expected if species infections were independent.4,5 However, modern polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based studies6,7 and statistical-mathematical analyses8,9 suggest that these deficits may be a consequence of infection dynamics: because peaks of parasitemia in a mixed P. vivaxP. falciparum infection typically alternate between the species,10,11 apparent deficits at the population level may reflect the detection thresholds of microscopy and the biologic interactions between parasites in infected individuals. In hindsight, this connection is implicit in classic longitudinal studies.12,13 Recent studies confirm that mixed-species infections are far more common than is generally recognized.14,15 Perhaps 3050% of all malaria infections recorded in Thailand are mixed P. vivaxP. falciparum.16,17
The dynamics of mixed P. vivaxP. falciparum infections present serious challenges for interventions at the individual and population levels: misdiagnosis and corresponding drug treatment can allow the cryptic species to rebound, with severe clinical consequences.18,19 Furthermore, if P. vivax infections temper the severity of P. falciparum pathology,20,21 an anti-P. vivax vaccine22 may have unanticipated adverse effects. Hence, it is crucial to move from phenomenological observation to more detailed mechanistic understanding of species interactions.
Although anemia is a common manifestation of malaria and a common cause of death in P. falciparum infections, no previous analyses of mixed-species malaria infections have taken into account the dynamics of the host RBC population. RBCs are the substrate on which the blood stages of Plasmodium species interact and compete for resources. P. falciparum can invade RBCs of all ages, whereas RBC susceptibility to P. vivax is restricted to the youngest age class, the reticulocytes.1,23 The great disparity in anemia-induced mortality is generally attributed to this distinction.24 Host hematopoetic responses to malaria infection may be critical, but remain poorly understood: they seem to vary between individuals and can include either compensatory RBC production or diserythropoesis.25
We recently used differential equation models for RBCPlasmodium dynamics to examine the consequences of age-structured RBC invasion and host erythropoetic response for the dynamics of single-species malaria infections.26 Although these models did not include explicit host immune responses, they provided insights into parasiteRBC interactions. For example, we found that without an aggressive host immune response, reticulocyte depletion during P. vivax infection chokes off the supply of mature RBCs, producing catastrophic anemia even if the fraction of RBCs infected remains < 1%. This result is in line with a recent report that hemoglobin concentrations in persistent low-level P. vivax infections are disproportionately suppressed compared with the percentage of RBCs infected.27 Also, we found that a compensatory response to RBC loss would enhance parasitemia and accelerate anemia by increasing the density of susceptible RBCs. Here we extend our analytic framework to encompass the more complex circumstances of mixed P. vivaxP. falciparum infections, again with the aim of discovering constraints and imperatives that RBC dynamics impose on malaria parasites and host responses. In particular, we wondered if competition for RBCs in a mixed-species infection could enable one species to facilitate the other.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
(with different values for different Plasmodium species) represents the ability of merozoites to find and bind to a target RBC. We assume that the lifespan of a circulating RBC is 120 days, that the reticulocyte stage spans ~36 hours after RBC release from the bone marrow,30 and that P. vivax invasion is restricted to reticulocytes.1 (We also did a small number of simulations with an assumption that P. vivax could attack RBCs of up to 14 days of age, based on a report suggesting that young RBCs beyond the reticulocyte stage might still be vulnerable to this species.31) Although there are reports that P. falciparum shows a preference for young RBCs,32 our earlier results indicate that these data should be interpreted with some caution, because the proportion of RBCs in young age classes always increases as a P. falciparum infection proceeds.26 Thus, we followed convention and assumed that P. falciparum has the same affinity for RBCs of any age. Note that our model could also be construed as representing dual phenotype P. falciparum infections in which one phenotype attacks only reticulocytes.
|
mer = 6 minutes.33 We take P = 16 for P. falciparum and P = 16 or 8 for P. vivax. Although multiple infections of RBCs are possible, they are rare31; for simplicity, we ignored them. We did not consider the development of merozoites into gametocytes, the non-replicating sexual blood forms that, taken up in an Anopheles blood meal, continue the mosquitohuman cycle.34 Nor do we consider the possible effects of synchronization among asexual blood forms35 or destruction of uninfected RBCs.36 Recent work suggests that sequestered P. falciparuminfected RBCs are capable of wide dissemination of released merozoites37; thus, we ignore the sequestration of infected RBCs, because in our model, merozoiteRBC binding indirectly mediates interaction between the Plasmodium species. The immune responses that controls most malaria infections are not well understood and are likely to be multi-component and sensitive to the developmental stage of the parasite,38 so the model does not attempt to incorporate them directly. Our intent here is to investigate the constraints and imperatives RBC dynamics impose on infection dynamics. (In the Discussion below, we return to the question of the immune effects.) However, the host is not passive in this model. First, the host dies of catastrophic anemia if the RBC count declines to 75% of the basal count. In addition, we examine three models for host response to the added RBC loss because of infection: 1) RBC production increases proportionally to the extra rate of RBC loss, up to twice the basal rate ("compensatory" response). 2) RBC production decreases proportionally to the infection-induced loss, down to 0.8 times the basal rate ("diserythropoetic" response), and 3) RBC production remains fixed at the basal rate needed to maintain 5 x 106 RBC/µL in a healthy host (~1,736 RBC µL1h1).30 For models 1 and 2, the time constant in response changes in the RBC count is 48 hours,30 and reduction in RBC loss allows a return to homeostasis. Details are explained in the mathematical appendix.
Basic reproduction rate. We showed previously by probability arguments that the mean number of descendants produced by an infected RBC is
![]() |
where V is the density of RBCs susceptible to the infecting species.26 R is a dynamical quantity that changes during the course of an infection (but never exceeds p). In our model,
MER, p, and
are fixed: dynamic changes in R develop from changes in V. (If a dynamic immune response were present, p,
MER, and
could change as well, depending on the component of the response.) The initial value of R at the beginning of infection, R0, is of major importance in a single-species infection: if R0 < 1 the parasite does not persist in the host, but if R0 > 1 the parasite population can reach a steady state or produce catastrophic anemia. We refer to R0 as the basic reproductive rate of a species (or phenotype). We take the initial V for P. falciparum as the basal total RBC count (5 x 106 µL1), and for P. vivax as the reticulocyte count of a healthy host, (
ret/120 days) x 5 x 106 µL1, where
ret = duration of the reticulocyte stage in days. (If
ret = 1.5 day, V = 6.25 x 104 µL1.) R0F and R0V refer to R0 for P. falciparum and P. vivax, respectively. Thus, if p = 16 for both species and
mer = 6 minutes, R0F = R0V implies that the affinity = of P. vivax for reticulocytes is > 100 times the = of P. falciparum for RBCs of all ages.
Strategy for simulation.
Our goal was to comprehensively map the models behavior in its parameter space. To this end, we simulated 2 x 104 hours of infection (or until the host died) for 26 values of R0 for each species, with p = 16 for both species and with RBCs vulnerable to P. vivax for 1.5 days, with R0 values ranging from R0 = 1 + 1/64 = 1.015625 (barely persistent) to R0 = 15 (extremely pathogenic). The values of R0 we chose to examine are equally spaced in log(R01) between log(1/64) and log(14). With p = 16, this range in R0 corresponds to a 220-fold difference in the size of
. In addition, we used the first 23 of these R0 values (from 1.015625 to ~7.19) to investigate the effects of setting P = 8 for P. vivax (with p = 16 for P. falciparum). We take
ST to be the time difference between the time of inoculation of P. falciparum and P. vivax:
ST < 0 means P. falciparum infected first, and
ST > 0 means P. vivax infected first. For all the (R0F, R0V) pairings, for both p = 16 and p = 8 for P. vivax, we did simulations for
ST = 50, 10, 5, 1, 0, 1, 5, 10, and 50 weeks. In addition, for each choice of (R0F, R0V) and
ST, we simulated each of the three types of host erythropoetic response to RBC loss described above. In the text, for simplicity we focus on representative values of
ST. As stated above, we performed additional simulations for representative values of R0F, R0V and
ST (with p = 16 for P. vivax) assuming that
ret has duration 14 rather than 1.5 days. Finally, we did a number of simulations for values of R0F and R0V not equal to any of the values equally spaced in log(R0 1).
Comparisons to single-species infections.
Many of our results below compare the change in peak infected RBC count, IPK, or the infected RBC count integrated over the course of infection, IINT, for a focal species (P. vivax or P. falciparum) in a mixed-species infection to the corresponding value in a single-species infection. For the comparisons that involve up-or downregulation of RBC production, we obtained the single-species values by running the single-species model with the identical up- or downregulation. Thus, as background for our mixed-species results, we briefly discuss single-species infections here. Figure 2
shows the outcome of simulations of single-species infections of P. vivax and P. falciparum, using our CODE model with the parameters of only one or the other species, and includes many results not shown in our previous work.26 The duration of RBC vulnerability to P. vivax is 1.5 days for both P. vivax examples shown. The curves for P. vivax with p = 8 are similar to those with p = 16; this would be expected because for fixed R0, the ratio of RBCmerozoite binding
for P = 8 to that for p = 16 is (16 -16 but with an R0)/(8 R0). (Curves for P. vivax with p = assumption that
ret is 14 rather than 1.5 days are presented in the supplemental material. These curves are closely similar to those in Figure 2
.)
|
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
ST. (The corresponding integrated parasitemias behave similarly; see supplemental material.) The results plotted in this figure are with the RBC source fixed at the basal rate, and show the typical pattern as
ST, R0F, and R0V change: the species suppressed and the degree of suppression depend on which species has the higher R0 value and which infects first; an advantage in one of these factors can often offset a disadvantage in the other. For the examples shown in Figure 3
ST. Typically, survival time is reduced when the host is infected with both rather than one species.
|
ST = 0, (Figure 4
ST = 5 weeks, (left column), a different mechanism causes suppression of P. falciparum by P. vivax: the culling of reticulocytes by P. vivax reduces the total uninfected RBC count and drives the instantaneous R for P. falciparum below 1, even though the P. vivax inoculation was 5 weeks after that of P. falciparum. The data supplement includes an example of system dynamics at a (R0F, R0V) combination that illustrates mutual suppression.
|
ST and three different combinations of p for P. vivax and
ret. (For P. falciparum, p = 16 in all three cases.) Even if P. falciparum infects many weeks before P. vivax, there are regions in (R0F, R0V) space in which peak P. vivax parasitemia is enhanced. [The integrated count for P. vivax is enhanced in a small region in (R0F, R0V) space in which the host survives for 20,000 hours; we found almost no enhancement for P. falciparum. See supplementary materials.] Although proportionally greater for values of R0V near 1, some enhancement of the maximum P. vivax parasitemia in mixed-species infections occurs even for values of R0V near P. Surprisingly, an enhancement of both peak and integrated P. vivax parasitemia can occur when the host has a diserythropoetic response, and P. falciparum infects many weeks before P. vivax, as shown in Figure 6
|
|
ret = 1.5 days.) The figures in the left column are for R0F = 1.5, R0V = 3.0,
ST = 10 weeks (P. vivax infects 10 weeks after P. falciparum), and a compensatory response in RBC production to infection-induced RBC loss. The figures in the middle column are for R0F = 1.1137, R0V = 1.061,
ST = 0 (simultaneous inoculations), and a compensatory response in RBC production to infection-induced RBC loss. The figures in the right column are for R0F = 1.087, R0V = 1.320,
ST = 50 weeks, and a diserythropoetic response. For the two examples shown with compensatory response, the peak P. vivax parasitemia is 11% greater in the dual-species infection than in the corresponding P. vivaxonly infection, although the integrated P. vivax parasitemia is suppressed in the dual-species infection. For the example with diserythropoetic response, the peak P. vivax parasitemia is 150% greater in the dual-species infection than the P. vivaxonly infection, and the integrated P. vivax parasitemia is enhanced in the dual-species infection by 79% over the P. vivaxonly value.
|
The right column plots in Figure 7
show catastrophic anemia produced by a P. vivax phenotype with a relatively high R0 superinfecting a P. falciparum infection that otherwise would have been controlled by the hosts diserythropoetic response. The P. vivax inoculation suppresses the P. falciparum IINT. However, the diserythropoesis triggered by the pre-existing P. falciparum infection slows the growth rate of P. vivax (Figure 7A
) until homeostasis returns, with the lessening of RBC loss caused by P. falciparum. The superinfecting P. vivax takes advantage of the boost in reticulocyte count (Figure 7C
), which greatly amplifies its growth rate and enhances its IPK over the single-species infection value. Even if we add a further 6-month delay to the recovery of RBC production, the P. vivax IPK in the mixed-species infection is higher than in the single-species infection (see data supplement).
Dynamical response from the RBC source can lead to coupled, long-term oscillations in the parasitemia of both species.
Our model predicts that if the RBC source is allowed to respond to the infection-induced cell loss, rather than remaining at a fixed rate, the parasitemia of the two species in a dual-species infection will tend to undergo long-term, coupled oscillations, provided that the host survives. Figure 8
shows this long-term behavior by presenting the results of simulated infections for up to 200-week duration. (For the three examples,
ret = 1.5 days.) The figures in the left column are for R0F = 1.181, R0V = 1.087,
ST = +50 weeks (P. vivax infects 50 weeks before P. falciparum), with the RBC production rate fixed at the basal rate. The figures in the middle column are for the same R0F, R0V, and
ST, but with a diserythropoetic response by the RBC source. The figures in the right column are for R0F = 1.125, R0V = 1.0442,
ST = 10 weeks (P. vivax infects 10 weeks after P. falciparum), with a compensatory response to infection-induced RBC loss.
|
ST = +50 weeks with a diserythropoetic response (middle column), not only does the presence of the earlier-infecting P. vivax prevent P. falciparum from killing the host, but the introduction of P. falciparum modifies the amplitude and phase of the oscillations of the P. vivax parasitemia. In the mixed-species infection, the oscillations of the two parasitemias become coupled, with P. vivax counts reaching their maxima a few weeks before P. falciparum counts. For both species, the maxima and minima in the counts differ by factors of 10100. The parasitemia oscillations are coupled to those of the reticulocyte population. Oscillatory behavior is not so regular in the times series in the right column, for a case with compensatory response to infection-induced RBC loss; nonetheless, the presence of the earlier-infecting P. falciparum induces more frequent oscillations in the P. vivax parasitemia, and P. vivax, in turn, suppresses the P. falciparum parasitemia. There is a complex series of oscillations in the reticulocyte count.
Reductions in a susceptible RBC population can boost the integrated parasitemia of a superinfecting species by extending the hosts lifespan.
The example in the middle column of Figure 8
(R0F = 1.181, R0V = 1.087,
ST = +50 weeks, diserythropoetic response) shows a second mechanism of enhancement of one species parasitemia by the presence of another: the reduction of the RBC population by one species can prevent a later-infecting species from killing the host, thus increasing the integrated parasitemia of the later-infecting species. In this example, an initial P. vivax infection reduces the overall RBC count and prevents a subsequent P. falciparum infection from inducing catastrophic anemia. However, this second mechanism of facilitation occurs over regions of (R0F, R0V) space that are tiny compared with those in which P. vivax is enhanced through increasing transients of RBC production.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
or p or both: we would expect a dynamic immune response to reduce the instantaneous growth rates R (not R0) of the two parasites to values near 1 much more quickly than in our model (in which R can only be reduced from R0 by a reduction in the RBC population vulnerable to the species) and to start the chronic phase of the disease within a matter of weeks. The long-term model behavior for R0F and R0V less than ~1.75 may still be relevant for understanding real infections. The key point suggested by our results is that a transient rise in RBC production could boost P. vivax parasitemia, whether that transient is a direct response to the extra RBC loss because of infection or arises from a return to homeostasis with the control of a P. falciparum infection. There is no reason a priori why the hosts immune response should be expected to obliterate this effect of RBC competition. Because P. vivax and P. falciparum diverged long ago, the challenges they present a common host should be similar but not identical. Salient differences should be reflected in host responses. For instance, P. vivax induces fever at a much lower parasitemia than does P. falciparum, suggesting that their interactions may involve a difference in the production of pyrogenic cytokines.4244 It is clear that innate and acquired immune responses differ in their regulatory effects on parasite dynamics in P. vivaxP. falciparum infections,9,45 and it seems likely that most malaria infections are controlled by combinations of species- and phenotype-specific responses along with more general ones. Our results here suggest that these various distinctions should be examined more closely with regard to the erythropoetic involvement, especially as the qualitative behavior of the model is remarkably robust to changes in model parameters.
Although the infamous persistence of P. vivax infections has generally been attributed to its latent liver stages, PCR-based studies have begun to confirm suspicions that P. falciparum infections also persist much longer than is commonly recognized.4648 (As far back as 1951, Eyles and Young reported that parasitemia detectible with the methods of the time can last more than a year in neurosyphilis patients infected with P. falciparum.49) Thus, in the context of our model of mixed-species infections, it is interesting that both a variable host erythropoetic response and a limitation of susceptible RBCs can alter R for one or both species so as to delay or prevent catastrophic anemia, and/or generate long-term coupled oscillations of the parasitemia of the two species with a period on the order of weeks to months. As the hosts immune response was almost certainly a signficant determinant of the coupled oscillatory behavior of the P. vivax and P. falciparum parasitemia in dually infected neurosyphilis patients,9 our results cannot be directly compared with the patterns seen in these or other patients. Our model indicates that competition for RBCs may have a role in inducing or otherwise contributing to such behavior, however.
Where P. vivax and P. falciparum co-occur, their ongoing evolution must be influenced by competition for RBCs, in part by affecting the dynamics of their gametocytes. It is gametocytes, ingested by a mosquito, that can recombine and propagate parasite genes. However, because gametocyte production trades replicating, non-transmissible forms for non-replicating, transmissible forms, it reduces the rate of RBC destruction.50 Thus, it is intriguing that P. falciparum gametocytemia is increased in the reticulocyte-rich blood of sickle-cell patients51 and decreased, in density and frequency, in P. vivaxP. falciparum infections.52 Gametocyte production and transmission remain poorly understood, and our model cannot directly address these observations, but, if the probability that a species gametocytes are transmitted is proportional to that species IPK or IINT, our results suggest that in most situations the species that has the higher R0 or infects earlier would have an advantage, because RBC competition generally suppresses both IPK and IINT for the other species. How-ever, the seemingly small regions of (R0F, R0V) space in which one species would facilitate IPK or IINT (and thus transmission) of the other could be important in selecting for traits that encourage or discourage co-infections. They may be important in selection of traits in the host as well. How the hosts immune response would affect the size and boundaries of those regions in (R0F, R0V) space is an important question for study.
| MATHEMATICAL APPENDIX |
|
|
|---|
on average with standard deviation sd, the number of compartments F is set so that sd =
F1/2. In a sense, the compartments are an abstraction, but the duration and standard deviation of the development process are the tangible quantities. The CODEs for the development chain of infected RBCs are
![]() |
where subscript sp is v for P. vivax or f for P. falciparum, Fsp is the number of compartments in the development chain for the given species, and
sp = Fsp/
sp. µf and µv are the merozoite counts for the two species. Vsp is the total count of vulnerable RBCs for a given species: Vv = total reticulocyte count, and Vf = ET, the total uninfected RBC count. Because we took
f =
v = 48 hours, with a variance of 4.8 hours, Ff = Fv = 100. Because of their short duration in the blood, we used just one compartment for the merozoite stage:
![]() |
In our simulations, we took pf = 16, pv = 8 or 16, and
µ,f =
µ,v = 0.1 hour. Lsp(t) is the primary infusion of merozoites of the given species from the liver into blood, which is believed to happen quickly and involve 104105 merozoites after the liver stage of the parasite develops for ~1 week. For simplicity, we took Lsp(t) = 0, except for a 1-hour period:
![]() |
where t0,sp is the time of initial inoculation with the given species. Use of other functional forms for Lsp(t) changed the outcome of test simulations little. For our simulations, the initial time (t = 0) corresponds to the release of the first parasite from the liver.
Using the notation in Figure 1
, the CODEs for the RBC development chains are
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Here,
R=
R/FR,
M=
M/FM, and
S=
S/FS, where
is the duration of the respective blood development stages. For reticulocytes, we took
R = 36 hours with sd = 6 hours, so that FR = 36; for mature-stage RBCs,
M = 2,796 hours with sd = 168 hours so that FM = 276; for senescent-stage RBCs,
S = 48 hours with sd = 12 hours so that FS = 16.
The model for the RBC marrow source depends on how the source responds to change in the count of uninfected RBCs. For compensatory erythropoesis,30 we take
![]() |
Here,
0 is the basal RBC production rate,
MX is the maximum allowed RBC production rate, which we took as 2
0 ; 1/
, the response time to changes in ET, was set to 48 hours. For diserythropoesis, we assume that
(t) is driven towards a floor value
MN= 0.8
0 instead:
![]() |
Again, 1/
= 48 hours.
If at any point the merozoite count for a given species, the total infected RBC count for a given species, or the total uninfected RBC count drops to < 1 in a total blood volume of 5 x 106 µL, the values of all the compartments that contributed to that particular count were reset to zero. The CODE system was solved using the fifth-order Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg algorithm with adaptive stepsize control for time integration53,54 so that the difference between the fourth- and fifth-order solutions for each component of the CODE systems was less than one part in 106.
Received June 24, 2005. Accepted for publication February 22, 2006.
Acknowledgments: We thank David L. Smith, Wendy P. OMeara, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.
* Address correspondence to Philip G. McQueen, Mathematical & Statistical Computing Laboratory Division of Computational Bioscience, CIT/NIH, 12 South Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-5620. E-mail: mcqueenp{at}mail.nih.gov ![]()
Authors addresses: Philip G. McQueen, Mathematical & Statistical Computing Laboratory Division of Computational Bioscience, CIT/NIH, 12 South Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-5620, E-mail: mcqueenp{at}mail.nih.gov. F. Ellis McKenzie, Fogarty International Center, NIH Building 16, Bethesda, MD 20892, E-mail: mckenzel{at}mail.nih.gov.
Note: Additional supplemental figures appear online at www.ajtmh.org.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|