|
|
||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|
|
|---|
Geographic information systems (GISs) allow the integration of spatial and temporal information with satellite data to describe, understand, and predict the potential distribution of arthropod vectors and transmission of pathogens.810 Analysis of spatial data of vector-borne diseases using global and local spatial statistics can identify clustering of vector distribution and disease cases.1113 Using fine-resolution satellite imagery, a GIS, and spatial statistics tools, we describe the spatial reinfestation patterns by T. infestans in a rural community following a residual spraying with insecticides. A focal spatial statistic is used to test whether different infested sites were potential sources for subsequent reinfestation, allowing for a time-lag in the detection of T. infestans. This is part of a longitudinal study of the epidemiology and control of Chagas disease in northern Santiago del Estero initiated in 1985. The ultimate aims of the study are to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the process of reinfestation by triatomine bugs; to produce risk maps and predictions for reinfestation that may be used by vector control programs to evaluate and prioritize control efforts, and to add a spatial component to a mathematical model of Trypanosoma cruzi transmission.14
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|
|
|---|
Most houses are made of adobe walls and thatched roofs, with one or two adjacent bedrooms and a front veranda 510 meters wide. These areas share a common roof and will be referred to hereafter as domestic or domiciliary areas. Poultry, pigs, and goats are raised by villagers for subsistence in the compound around the domiciliary area. This peridomestic area consists of a patio and 38 structures (store rooms, kitchen, corrals, wood piles, trees) separated from human habitations and were described by Canale and others.16 All houses were identified with a numbered plaque and mapped in 1992, and new and abandoned structures were continuously recorded.
Field surveys. All houses in the study area were sprayed with deltamethrin by the Servicio Nacional de Chagas (NCS) in 1985,15 and then in 1992 when the effectiveness of the spraying was also assessed.7 In Amamá and other nearby villages, the surveillance phase spanned from December 1992 to 2002 and included a strong community participation component.5,17,18 The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the National Chagas Institute Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben of the Argentine Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. The study objectives were explained to residents and all participants signed an informed consent form.
During each visit, householders were asked about recent housing improvements, the domestic use of insecticides, the place where chickens usually nested, and the numbers of fowl and corralled animals (goats, sheep, cows, horses, and mules) owned by each family. Each domestic and peridomestic site in Amamá was searched for triatomine bugs from October 1993 to October 2002, except in 2001 when only infested peridomestic structures were searched for triatomine bugs for other purposes (Ceballos LA and others, unpublished data). The vector collection methods used were described by Gürtler and others.18 The reinfestation of each house was evaluated by skilled bug collectors from the NCS using timed manual collections with 0.2% tetramethrin (Icona, Buenos Aires, Argentina) as an irritant agent (the flushing-out method); by householders collections starting in May 1993 when a labeled self-sealing plastic bag was provided to each household; by domestic sensor boxes (Biosensor; Biocientífica de Avanzada; Buenos Aires, Argentina) placed in bedrooms in mid-December 1992; and by knockdown collections after using one or two insecticide fumigant canisters (Aguvac, Buenos Aires, Argentina) per bedroom or spraying with deltamethrin (25 mg of active ingredient/meter2) (K-Othrina; Agrevo, San Isidro, Argentina).
Every 12 months from October 1993 to December 1997, two persons searched bedrooms while another person searched peridomestic sites for 30 minutes per site (one person-hour and 0.5 person-hours, respectively). Additional searches for bugs were carried out in peridomestic sites during May 1995, 1996, and 1997 (0.5 person-hours per house). All bugs were identified to species and stage at the field laboratory,16 and individually examined for T. cruzi infection.17 From 1993 to 1995, only sites with at least one T. infestans adult or nymph, but not with other triatomines, were treated selectively with deltamethrin (25 mg of active ingredient/meter2) by NCS staff as before. Sixteen domiciles in Amamá were treated with one or two insecticide fumigant canisters per bedroom or sprayed with deltamethrin at the standard dose in late 1995. Surveillance activities were transferred to the communities between late 1995 and 1996. Starting in 1996, the capture of one T. infestans bug of any stage prompted treatment of all domestic and peridomestic areas of each house, but most of the focal insecticide sprays were made after the November survey in 1997.17
Mapping and geospatial processing. An Ikonos satellite image (Space Imaging, Atlanta, GA) with 1-meter2 panchromatic and 4-meter2 multi-spectral resolution acquired in October 2002 was georeferenced using global positioning system (GPS) (Trimble GeoExplorer II; Trimble Navigation Ltd., Sunnyvale, CA) readings from landmarks in the field. The image was used to digitize structures that were not located originally with the GPS. The exact location of 636 structures was overlaid on the image using sketch maps from each house. The entomological database from Amamá was associated with x and y coordinates (in Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 20S, WGS1984 datum) of each identified structure using ArcGIS 8.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA).
Statistical analysis. We restricted the analysis of the reinfestation process to 19931997 because only 89 selective residual insecticide treatments were carried out, most of them (72% of the sites) by late 1997; thus, the system was less perturbed than thereafter. The effects of selective insecticide spraying during both periods will be presented elsewhere. The prevalence and abundance of infestations were calculated for ecotopes with at least one infested site detected during 19931997. Global (weighted K-function) and local (Gi[d]) spatial statistics were used to detect clustering of bugs within the study area and to identify epicenters of infestation. The weighted K-function was used to analyze the spatial distribution patterns of abundance of T. infestans among all locations (sites) in the study area after the exclusion of two distant and not frequently inhabited houses (A119 and A114).19 A local spatial statistic, such as Gi(d),12 can be used as a focal statistic when the weight of the point being evaluated is not included in the calculation.20,21 Gi(d) was used as a focal spatial statistic to measure spatial clustering of T. infestans abundance around known and suspected sources of T. infestans reinfestation and to calculate the range of distances over which such reinfestation occurred. For example, the site that was an epicenter in time t was considered with the data for other sites in the following year (t + 1) and up to four years later (t + 4). In this way, we represented the temporal aspect in the process of reinfestation and the probable effect of a time delay in the detection of infestation of a site. When using Gi[d], we considered more than one site as a potential source, and we corrected for multiple comparisons by adopting the significance levels listed by Ord and Getis.22 Spatial analyses were performed using Point Pattern Analysis software (San Diego State University, San Diego, CA).23
| RESULTS |
|
|
|---|
2 = 59.6, degrees of freedom [df] = 1, P < 0.01), and each year, with the exception of 1994, was higher in OctoberNovember than in May (Figure 1A
|
|
2 = 39.4, df = 1, P < 0.01), in pig corrals from 9% to 33% (
2 = 6.2, df = 1, P <0.05), in goat corrals from 0% to 33% (
2 = 10.7, df = 1, P < 0.01), and in ecotopes associated with chickens from 2% to 25% (
2 = 15.7, df = 1, P < 0.01), but the increase in wood piles from 5% to 25% was not significant (
2 = 2.35, df = 1, P = 0.1) (Figure 1B
2 = 0.19, df = 1, P = 0.7).
The relative contribution of each type of ecotope to total infested sites from 19931995 to 19961997 increased for domiciles (from 21% to 51%), ecotopes associated with chickens (from 14% to 22%), and goat corrals (from 0% to 8%), but decreased in pig corrals (from 29% to 13%), wood piles (from 21% to 6%), and in fences or trees (from 14% to 1%). However, the mean abundance of T. infestans per site increased in all types of ecotope, and peaked in 1997 in ecotopes associated with chickens (mean ± SD = 9.4 ± 9.43), followed by pig (7.5 ± 9.96) and goat corrals (6.4 ± 10.98) (Table 2
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The numbers of T. infestans per site in 1997 were significantly clustered (Gi[d] > 2.32, P < 0.01) at a distance of 100150 meters around another pig corral (A46) where infestation was detected in 1995 (Figure 5B
). However, this range of distances is within the compound level and does not explain the spatial pattern of bug abundance in 1997. Other potential sources in 1996 were tested in an attempt to explain the 1997 spatial pattern, but no significant clustering was detected around them. Indeed, the spatial pattern of T. infestans abundance at five years post-spraying seems to have arisen by several continuous and simultaneous sources of T. infestans instead of from one single source. The reinfestation dynamics in northern Amamá was not explained by the A116 pig corral or other potential sources; its origin seemed to be independent of the southern sources.
| DISCUSSION |
|
|
|---|
The scale at which a health problem is studied should reflect an understanding of the disease process and likely causative factors.25 In our study, we georeferenced all sites within a village to create the distance matrices needed to apply spatial statistics for the identification of sources of reinfestation by T. infestans. This scale of spatial analysis allowed us to incorporate environmental heterogeneity (e.g., different ecotopes) while considering the biological mechanisms that underlie the reinfestation process. Triatoma infestans can disperse actively by flight or walking and passively through accidental carriage by humans and their belongings.26,27 Flight initiation of T. infestans was female biased and dispersing adults were found up to 550 meters from release point in salt flats.28 In our study area, the number of flight-dispersing T. infestans males was positively associated with the abundance of adult T. infestans in peridomestic sites within 200 meters around each light trap, and the very few fifth-instar nymphs attracted to the light traps probably walked 29 to 42 meters from the nearest infested sites.29 These distances are within the range of significant clustering (up to 475 meters) that we detected around the 1993 pig corral source two and three years later. Moreover, the 19931995 period was characterized by very low abundance of T. infestans and higher frequency of peridomestic sites infested with only adults or fifth-instar nymphs in comparison with subsequent years. Thus, T. infestans flight dispersal appeared to be the main mechanism driving the observed spatial pattern of reinfestation during the early surveillance phase following spraying. On the other hand, dispersal of stage IV and V nymphs by walking could contribute to increased clustering, within and among neighboring compounds, close to the epicenter.
Focal statistics confirmed that the high abundance of T. infestans per site in 1995 and 1996 was significantly clustered around the 1993 pig corral source. By 1995, the sites located some 450 meters around this source probably became infested through the invasion of flight-dispersing triatomines. Whether the deltamethrin spray promoted a repellent or flushing-out effect on the surviving triatomines infesting the pig corral remains unclear. During the surveillance phase, when bug abundance is very low, the flushing-out method fails to detect many peridomestic triatomine populations.6 This explains in part why the newly infested sites originating from the primary pig corral were detected two years after it was sprayed. The distance from the pig corral to other compounds may also have contributed to the time delay in detecting T. infestans in its neighborhood. The pig corral source, located near the center of the community where houses were also more concentrated, was large, crowded with hosts, and thus difficult to treat. This pig corral had a residual focus of T. infestans detected only two months after the 1992 blanket spraying,7 and had the highest frequency of reinfestation and bug abundance during the surveillance phase.
The peridomestic environment offers a wide range of hosts, refuges, and climatic conditions for successful development of triatomine populations. However, not all peridomestic ecotopes appear to be equally suitable for T. infestans or play the same role during the reinfestation process. The role of animal corrals as sources for reinfestation during the surveillance phase is reinforced by an empirical model that predicted that the probability of T. infestans flight initiation would peak in summer from pig and goat corrals but not from ecotopes associated with chickens in the Amamá area (Ceballos LA and others, unpublished data). Pig corrals became infested earlier (October 1993) and reached a higher prevalence of infestation (up to May 1997) and mean abundance of T. infestans than goat corrals. Although pig corrals were the most important ecotopes that promoted reinfestation in 19931995, their relative contribution to infestation decreased from 1993 to 1997, while the contribution of goat corrals and ecotopes associated with chickens increased. We conclude that wooden pig corrals with permanent resident hosts, in which insecticide spraying has limited effectiveness, were key sources of T. infestans during the initial stage of the reinfestation process in Amamá.
Goat or sheep corrals have long been known to support abundant populations of T. infestans in the dry Chaco region, and had higher prevalence of T. infestans before and after residual spraying with insecticides than other ecotopes.30 In Amamá, however, during the first years following a blanket spraying, goat corrals were not a detectable source and their prevalence of infestation increased slowly. In general, the local patterns of reinfestation are affected by demographic and environmental variables. In Amamá, changes in land ownership and use since 1990 determined that the village was surrounded by a wire fence that restricted the movement of goats and access to the scarce grass available. This affected householders management practices of goats and other domestic animals, and probably impacted on host availability for triatomine bugs.
The ecotopes associated with chickens supported small T. infestans populations with high nutritional status and thus a very low flight dispersal potential in spring-summer (Ceballos LA and others, unpublished data). However, since peridomestic chicken nesting sites differed in physical structure and stability throughout the year, in the absence of chickens the local bug populations would likely die out or disperse elsewhere and serve as sources for reinfestation. The ecotopes associated with chickens had an increasing prevalence and abundance of T. infestans in Amamá during the late surveillance phase. In light of the heterogeneity of rural endemic areas in the Chaco region, the key peridomestic ecotopes for reinfestation may vary largely between zones and perhaps over time. Taking into account the unique characteristics of the local environment is crucial for improved vector control.
Focal spatial statistics were used to recommend control strategies for schistosomiasis in Kenya,21 and to analyze the vector distribution of T. guasayana in Amamá (Vazquez-Prokopec GM and others, unpublished data). To explain the observed spatio-temporal patterns of reinfestation and develop risk maps at the village level, integration of data on the local numbers of animals, type of construction material, focal insecticide spraying, and vector distribution into a GIS is needed. Geographic information systems, satellite imagery, and spatial statistics need to be applied to eco-epidemiological research on Chagas disease to provide scientifically based, improved tactics to control programs of T. infestans. The combined effects of spraying all peridomestic sites, as well as residual foci during and immediately after the blanket insecticide spraying, active surveillance with community participation, and regular removal of triatomines contributed to slow down the rate of domiciliary reinfestation in Amamá in 19921997 compared with that recorded in 19851992.5,15 Even more important, the set of control actions also reduced to marginal levels the transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi to T. infestans17 and dogs taken as sentinels of domestic risk of infection.31 Although T. infestans was not eliminated at the community level, a sustained interruption of transmission has been achieved until 2002 (Gürtler RE and others, unpublished data). Our results suggest that residual spraying with insecticides of the colonized site and all sites within a radius of 450 meters will be effective in preventing the subsequent propagation of T. infestans after a community-wide residual spraying with insecticides. Targeted surveillance of key peridomestic sites, such as goat and pig corrals, using low-cost sensing devices,32 and improved treatment regimens are recommended. Such detection boxes may also be used to distinguish a recent invasion from an established bug colony and to indicate the local extinction of T. infestans foci. Understanding the spatio-temporal population dynamics of T. infestans in domestic and peridomestic habitats may help improve the effectiveness of control efforts.
Received April 21, 2004. Accepted for publication July 2, 2004.
Acknowledgments: We thank Dr. Roberto Chuit and Abel Hurvitz and his staff at the National Control Service (Argentina) for providing active support during fieldwork; María Moyano and Omar Sitatti for field accommodation; Amamá residents for their participation in this effort; Janet Thornhill for assistance in the digitizing phase, and Delmi Canale for her long-term support. The Amamá database is the product of a sustained collaborative effort between researchers from the University of Buenos Aires (Ricardo E. Gürtler, Directorate of Epidemiology, Minister of Health and Social Action, the Argentina-National Chagas Service (Roberto Chuit), and Rockefeller University (Joel E. Cohen) between 1992 and 2000.
Financial support: This study was supported by awards from the Natonal Institutes of Health/National Science Foundation Ecology of Infectious Disease program award R01 TW05836 funded by the Fogarty International Center and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to Uriel Kitron and Ricardo E. Gürtler), the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica (Argentina), and the University of Buenos Aires to Ricardo E. Gürtler. Ricardo E. Gürtler and Maria C. Cecere are members of the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Researchers Career.
Authors addresses: María C. Cecere, Ricardo E. Gürtler, and Gonzalo M. Vazquez-Prokopec, Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Ciudad Universitaria, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Telephone: 54-11-4576300/09 extension 223, Fax: 54-11-45763384, E-mails: carla{at}bg.fcen.uba.ar, gurtler{at}bg.fcen.uba.ar, and gvazquez{at}bg.fcen.uba.ar. Uriel Kitron, Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Illinois, 2001 South Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, Telephone: 217-244-5954, Fax: 217-244-7421, E-mail: ukitron{at}uiuc.edu.
| REFERENCES |
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Z. Levy, V. R. Quispe-Machaca, J. L. Ylla-Velasquez, L. A. Waller, J. M. Richards, B. Rath, K. Borrini-Mayori, J. G. C. del Carpio, E. Cordova-Benzaquen, F. E. McKenzie, et al. Impregnated Netting Slows Infestation by Triatoma infestans Am J Trop Med Hyg, October 1, 2008; 79(4): 528 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Gurtler, U. Kitron, M. C. Cecere, E. L. Segura, and J. E. Cohen Sustainable vector control and management of Chagas disease in the Gran Chaco, Argentina PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16194 - 16199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. CLENNON, P. L. MUNGAI, E. M. MUCHIRI, C. H. KING, and U. KITRON SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VARIATIONS IN LOCAL TRANSMISSION OF SCHISTOSOMA HAEMATOBIUM IN MSAMBWENI, KENYA Am J Trop Med Hyg, December 1, 2006; 75(6): 1034 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. CARDINAL, M. B. CASTANERA, M. A. LAURICELLA, M. C. CECERE, L. A. CEBALLOS, G. M. VAZQUEZ-PROKOPEC, U. KITRON, and R. E. GURTLER A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF SUSTAINED VECTOR SURVEILLANCE FOLLOWING COMMUNITY-WIDE INSECTICIDE APPLICATION ON TRYPANOSOMA CRUZI INFECTION OF DOGS AND CATS IN RURAL NORTHWESTERN ARGENTINA. Am J Trop Med Hyg, October 1, 2006; 75(4): 753 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. REITHINGER, L. CEBALLOS, R. STARIOLO, C. R. DAVIES, and R. E. GURTLER EXTINCTION OF EXPERIMENTAL TRIATOMA INFESTANS POPULATIONS FOLLOWING CONTINUOUS EXPOSURE TO DOGS WEARING DELTAMETHRIN-TREATED COLLARS. Am J Trop Med Hyg, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 766 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |