AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med., s1-29(3), 1949, pp. 323-336
Copyright © 1949 by American Journal of Tropical Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lilligren, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lilligren, B. L.

Chemotherapy of Experimental Endamoeba Histolytica Infection in Dogs

Paul E. Thompson AND Betty Lou Lilligren
From the Research Laboratories, Parke, Davis and Company, Detroit, Michigan

Dogs maintained on a fish diet were highly susceptible to infection with a human strain of Endamoeba histolytica, obtained from stock cultures or from an experimentally infected animal. Infected animals fed a strict fish diet developed and maintained acute or subacute infections for several months. The course of these infections was sufficiently uniform and mortality among infected animals was sufficiently low to permit chemotherapeutic studies. The infection was primarily an amebic colitis; extra-intestinal infections were not encountered.

Treatment of the infections with established antiamebic and antibacterial drugs revealed satisfactory correlation between the chemotherapeutic response of canine and human amebiasis. Emetine HCl, carbarsone, chiniofon, diiodo-oxyquinoline and amodiaquin exerted antiamebic action in dogs. Cures were obtained with carbarsone, chinifon and diiodo-oxyquinoline but not with emetine or amodiaquin. Chloroquin, sodium penicillin G, streptomycin, sulfadiazine and succinylsulfathiazole were ineffective under the conditions of this study.

The failure of the antibacterial agents—penicillin, streptomycin, sulfadiazine and succinylsulfathiazole—to affect the course of the infections indicated that amebae rather than bacteria are the primary etiologic agent in canine amebiasis.

Consideration of the relative merits of dogs, monkeys, kittens and rats for evaluating the activity of potential antiamebic drugs indicated that canine infections should be particularly useful in the search for new chemotherapeutic agents.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1949 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.