AJTMH HINARI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 8(6), 1959, pp. 689-697
Copyright © 1959 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by McClure, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scherer, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by McClure, H. E.

Ecologic Studies of Japanese Encephalitis Virus in Japan

V. Avian Factors

W. F. Scherer, E. L. Buescher AND H. E. McClure
Department of Virus and Rickettsial Diseases, 406th Medical General Laboratory, U. S. Army, Japan

Certain characteristics of ardeids and their behavior were important in the ecology of JE virus at heronries near Tokyo, Japan.

No species of ardeid was innately immune to JE virus but, following infection, birds developed immunity which probably reduced the size of the susceptible bird population. Up to 67% of newly-hatched birds possessed passively-acquired, maternal, neutralizing antibody which subsequently disappeared. Although this antibody could temporarily delay infection of nestlings, it probably did not significantly reduce the total seasonal amount of JE virus available in ardeids for infection of vector mosquitoes.

Breeding habits governed the supply of susceptible nestlings which, when viremic, serve as sources of virus for vector mosquitoes. Anatomical features, nest habitats and flight habits of adults influenced exposure of nestlings to mosquitoes. Flight activities and feeding habits made possible the introduction of virus into heronries from without, either by viremic birds or by unknown mechanisms; for example, tissue invading endoparasites. Migration and dispersal of birds during August–November provided possible means of spreading virus beyond the colonies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1959 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.