AJTMH ASTMH Job Mart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 47(2), 1992, pp. 141-146
Copyright © 1992 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stenos, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stenos, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, B.

Quantification of Rickettsia Australis

John Stenos, Stephen Graves AND Brian Dwyer
Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Fairfield Infectious Diseases Hospital, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia

Several assay systems were compared for measuring the concentration of viable Rickettsia australis, including embryonated eggs, tissue cultures, and mouse inoculation. Direct rickettsial counts that included the enumeration of both viable and nonviable rickettsiae were used to obtain baseline values. Assays were conducted in parallel using serially diluted R. australis preparations to establish which assay displayed the greatest sensitivity and reproducibility. Overall, the plaque assay using buffalo green monkey kidney cells with centrifugation of the rickettsiae onto the monolayers was the most sensitive assay for detecting R. australis, while the embryonated egg assay and mouse lethality titrations were the least sensitive.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.