HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Halstead, S. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Halstead, S. B.

Etiologies of the Experimental Dengues of Siler and Simmons^*

Four participants in the American Army Philippine dengue (d) studies of Siler (1924–25) and five subjects from the studies of Simmons (1929–30) were bled 42 to 48 years after experimental infection. Sera were studied by hemagglutination-inhibition, complement-fixation and plaque reduction neutralization (PRNT) tests for antibodies to the known viral causes of the dengue syndrome in Asia and to St. Louis encephalitis virus. PRNT tests were done with and without fresh normal human serum (accessory factor). Serum from one of four Siler study volunteers had unequivocal evidence of only a previous d4 infection; the remainder had broadly reactive group B antibodies, including d4, suggesting past infection with two or more different dengue viruses. Sera from four of the Simmons study group had high-titered PRNT antibodies to d1 and the remaining serum had d1 antibody when accessory factor was added. In three sera there was monotypic PRNT antibody to d1. Accessory factor increased PRNT titers, particularly to d1 virus in the Simmons' group. Only sera with antibody patterns suggesting past infections with two or more dengue viruses had high levels of SLE PRNT antibody. It is concluded that d4 was transmitted in the 1924 to 1925 and d1 in the 1929 to 1930 experiments. Notable differences in clinical features of dengue infections in the two studies suggest the possibility of the existence of an unique spectrum of responses to infection with different dengue virus types.

Accepted for publication February 9, 1974.

^* This work is dedicated to the many individuals who contributed to these important studies on dengue, but particularly to nine men who once again shared their time and person for the advancement of medical knowledge.