AJTMH Tropical Medicine and Hygiene News
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 21(5), 1972, pp. 521-527
Copyright © 1972 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, D. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnsen, D. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, D. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH

Experimental Infection of the Gibbon (Hylobates Lar) with Dirofilaria Immitis*

Dennis O. Johnsen, Alexander de Paoli, Prayot Tanticharoenyos, Carter L. Diggs AND Douglas J. Gould
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Department of Parasitology, and Department of Medical Entomology, U.S. Army Medical Component, SEATO, APO San Francisco 96346

Four gibbons were inoculated subcutaneously with larvae of Dirofilaria immitis and studied for periods of time up to 14 months. Approximately 2 months following inoculation, skin test reactions converted to positive, eosinophil counts rose, and serological tests were positive for Dirofilaria-reactive antibody. Generally, these laboratory manifestations of infection persisted for the remainder of the study, but microfilaremia was never detected. Both live and dead heartworms were found in the heart and lungs of the infected animals. The pulmonary lesions associated with the infection closely resembled those reported in dogs.

Accepted for publication April 15, 1972.


* The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

In conducting the research described in this report, the investigators adhered to the "Guide for Laboratory Animal Facilities and Care," as promulgated by the Committee on the Guide for Laboratory Animal Facilities and Care of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.