AJTMH ASTMH MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION: astmh@astmh.org
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 2(4), 1953, pp. 677-682
Copyright © 1953 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rozeboom, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rozeboom, L. E.

Sexual Isolation in some North American Anopheles Mosquitoes1

Lloyd E. Rozeboom
Department of Parasitology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University

Cross mating experiments were designed to show whether sexual isolation exists between Anopheles quadrimaculatus, A. freeborni and A. aztecus.

It was found that a definite barrier to cross mating exists between males of A. quadrimaculatus and females of A. freeborni and A. aztecus, between males of A. aztecus and females of A. quadrimaculatus and A. freeborni, and between A. freeborni males and A. quadrimaculatus females. However, A. aztecus females were fertilized as readily by A. freeborni males as were A. freeborni females.

These results support conclusions drawn from other studies that A. aztecus and A. freeborni are much more closely related to one another than they are to A. quadrimaculatus. Sexual isolation could be a secondary result of long geographic separation. There is only a partial barrier between the A. freeborni and A. aztecus and although this might contribute towards a segregation of the two populations, the readiness with which A. aztecus females will mate with males of A. freeborni, even after a long period of geographic isolation, would lead one to suspect that in this case the primary dividing mechanism was not sexual isolation. This isolation would aid, however, in keeping the present-day populations distinct should their ranges overlap.


1 These studies were supported in part by a research grant from the Division of Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Public Health Service.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1953 by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.